A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio
✓Claimant Apoderado Judicial De Heyder Carlosama Lopez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por no invocarse ninguna de las causales de nulidad
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-229/16.
Se argumenta la violación al debido proceso, por haber sido expedida la providencia quebrantando las reglas procesales aplicables a los procesos constitucionales.
Específicamente se alega el desconocimiento de los precedentes sentados en los fallos T-677/04 y T-715/14.
Considera la Sala Plena de la Corporación que lo único que busca el actor es reabrir el debate, al igual que plantear su inconformidad con los argumentos de la Sentencia.
Se RECHAZA la nulidad formulada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR la nulidad de la sentencia T-229 de 2016, proferida por la Sala Sexta de Revision de la Corte Constitucional, instaurada por el apoderado del senor Heyder Carlosama Lopez.
- Segundo. Proceda la Secretaria General a notificar la presente decision a las partes del expediente T-5.350.275
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.